Our children are not only being taught to worship our President, but now they want to change their religion also. Anyone for Home Schooling? A lady on Glenn Beck’s show said that she Home Schools her children, and is required to teach them about homosexuality.
California’s course on world religions also omits Islam’s long history of jihadist violence, while portraying Christianity as an intolerant and bloodthirsty faith..
Christianity isn’t given equal time, either. It’s covered in just two days — as opposed to up to two weeks for Islam — and doesn’t involve kids in any role-playing activities like the Islam unit..
” California schools are pushing an unbalanced religious agenda that favors Islam and minimizes Christianity and Judaism,” Accuracy in Academia warns in its latest Campus Report.
Read this article. A friend of mine emailed it to me, and I looked it up on the internet.
We have to start praying for our Country as never before. We have to pray without ceasing also for our children. Hell is enlarging itself daily. I pray all the time about this. I pray that God will save the Presidents’ soul, and I bind the powers of Satan that has him bound, and I loose the convicting power of the Holy Spirit upon him. I do Congress the same way.
On Monday, Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill tried a new tack in rebutting the protesters while also minimizing their complaints. She got several hands when she asked audience members at a town hall meeting to raise their hands if they’re so scared about the federal government running health care that they “can’t think straight.”
It all has to do with their attitude. I have heard her on Fox News twice this past week, and I must admit that her attitude is better than any of the rest of the Congressmen over this health care debate. Even though I don’t agree with her politics, I think that she showed respect for her constituents this week.
Pelosi, and the others have been despicable, however.
For Pelosi and Hoyer, they charged that an “ugly campaign” is afoot to misrepresent the legislation, “disrupt” the public meetings and prevent members of Congress from “conducting a civil dialogue” on the topic.
“Let the facts be heard,” they wrote. “These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views — but of the facts themselves. Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.”
The “un-American” dig was a sign the debate is heating up. In a tight spot, Pelosi is known for employing tough rhetoric and accusations to muscle her way out.
Back in September 2008, Pelosi used similar language to complain about Republicans who weren’t showing up to talks on a Wall Street bailout package.
“I thought it was very unpatriotic of them not to show up, not to show up, in some ways, boycott the meetings earlier in the week,” she said.
She also reportedly called the GOP budget in 2006 “unpatriotic” because it drove up the national debt.
This past May, she accused the CIA of lying to Congress, as she was facing questions about how much she knew early on about the Bush administration’s interrogation policies.
Then last week, with the health care debate growing more heated, she invoked Nazi Germany, accusing protesters of “carrying swastikas and symbols like that” to meetings. A spokesman for Pelosi later said the speaker was referencing a photo taken at a town hall meeting hosted by Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., which showed a protester holding a sign of a swastika crossed out over President Obama’s name and a question mark.
Yet the language Pelosi is using for health care critics is nothing like the language she used to describe anti-war protesters criticized by war supporters as unpatriotic.
Pelosi, who led efforts to withdraw from Iraq before troops had finished the job, tolerated anti-war hecklers on several occasions.
“It’s always exciting,” she said of protesters who interrupted a meeting in January 2006, according to an account in the San Francisco Chronicle. “This is democracy in action. I’m energized by it, frankly.”
At an event in June 2007, she told anti-war protesters “just go for it, I respect your enthusiasm,” according to another account.
The claims of “un-American” behavior by critics is not something made by President Obama, who on Monday withheld criticism of his health care detractors.
“We are having a vigorous debate in the United States and I think that’s a healthy thing,” he said, speaking at a North American summit in Mexico.
Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said there’s not really any “substantive difference” between the anti-war protests of MoveOn and Code Pink then and the health care reform criticism today — other than the subject being addressed.
Cornyn told FOX News he thinks the latest charge of being “un-American” is a “pretty harsh statement” about Americans who have serious concerns about the health care legislation.
I think that Obama’ commented today like that due to him knowing what Pelosi said. Also, a certain Democrat from Georgia is going to here from me about how he acted at a townhall meeting in Douglasville, Ga.
I just hope that everyone remembers how the Democrats have treated their constituents during this debate when it is time to vote. They need to learn who puts them in office.
Read these two posts on Michelle Malkin’s board. Here, and here.
I am just waiting for the day that the truth does come out. Good work, Michelle! I have suspected Acorn ever since the election. They need to be brought down. The thing that bothers me is Obama’s campaign contributions and his relationship with Acorn and Project Vote.
Remember the stories about dead people recieving stimulus checks a few weeks ago? How did they get them? It is awful strange to me that I don’t remember dead people getting checks when they got a stimulus check from President Bush. Do any of you remember that? Did you hear that dead people got checks?
The following is Acorn’s Preamble:
Preamble
We stand for a People’s Platform, as old as our country, and as young as our dreams. We come before our nation, not to petition with hat in hand, but to rise as one people and demand.
We have waited and watched. We have hoped and helped. We have sweated and suffered. We have often believed. We have frequently followed.
But we have nothing to show for the work of our hand, the tax of our labor. Our patience has been abused; our experience misused. Our silence has been seen as support. Our struggle has been ignored.
Enough is enough. We will wait no longer for the crumbs at America’s door. We will not be meek, but mighty. We will not starve on past promises, but feast on future dreams.
We are an uncommon people. We are the majority, forged from all minorities. We are the masses of many, not the forces of few. We will continue our fight until the American way is just one way, until we have shared the wealth, until we have won our freedom.
This is not a simple vision, but a detailed plan.
Our plan is to build an American reality from the American rhetoric, to deliver a piece of the present and the fruits of the future to every man, to every woman, to every family.
We demand our birthright: the chance to be rich, the right to be free.
Our riches shall be the blooming of our communities, the bounty of a sure livelihood, the beauty of homes for our families with sickness driven from the door, the benefit of our taxes rather than their burden, and the best of our energy, land, and natural resources for all people.
Our freedom is the force of democracy, not the farce of federal fat and personal profit. In our freedom, only the people shall rule. Corporations shall have their role; producing jobs, providing products, paying taxes. No more, no less. They shall obey our wishes, respond to our needs, serve our communities. Our country shall be the citizens’ wealth and our wealth shall build our country.
Government shall have its role: public servant to our good, fast follower to our sure steps. No more, no less. Our government shall shout with the public voice and no longer to a private whisper. In our government, the common concerns shall be the collective cause.
We represent a people’s platform, not a politician’s promise.
We demand the changes outlined in our platform and plan. We will work to win. We will have our birthright. We will live in richness and freedom. We will live in one country as one people.
Are Obama’s chickens coming home to roost?
How about a grass-roots protest against Acorn, and us having to pay taxes on stuff we don’t agree with. Did you see where the guy that played Coach told Glenn Beck he didn’t want to pay his taxes?
I thought that the background was beautiful. I thought that the sound quality during the speech was kind of choppy. Or maybe it could have been my cable.
I thought that he put a lot of effort into the speech. You could tell that he was nervous. It is hard to make a speech when you have to look into the camera without an audience.
I thought that the speech itself was good. “Americans can do anything” was the main message to give us hope in these times of financial hardship. Was it just me, or did I find his message more encouraging than gloom and doom, Barack Obama’s?
I watched the speech on Fox. I couldn’t believe that Brit Hume and the panel criticized Bobby Jindal’s speech. I have often thought that Brit Hume was in the tank for Obama anyway.
For one thing, Jindal had to follow Obama, who is thought to be a great orator anyway. That put him at a disadvantage before he ever spoke. I couldn’t believe that Chris Matthews came out with “Oh my God” when Bobby Jindal walked up to the camera on NSNBC.
I just don’t think that he will. What about all his foreign campaign contributions with names like Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse? How do we know that they didn’t come from Hamas?
I have felt that for some time. Then, I find this article on Fox News.
The Feds are saying that Obama Prayer leader is from a group linked to Hamas. Your thoughts?
Reverend Wright is at it again. Did anyone notice that he got Hiroshima mixed up with the bombing of Pearl Harbour? Just think, Barack Obama sat in this man’s church for 20 years.
Check out this article that was in the New York Times, written by William Ayers. Before the election, he wouldn’t say anything, now he is talking. He says he did vandalism, and not terrorism.
